Date: July 2026
Joe Colangelo recently published a LinkedIn post regarding his criminal proceedings, which can be viewed here and posted below: Joe Colangelo LinkedIn
In the post, he states that the remaining criminal matter is scheduled for a two-day trial on April 15 & 16, 2027, and asserts that the original fraud allegations were stayed on November 10, 2025, with the remaining allegation continuing only because of a clerical oversight.
Readers should be aware that this description reflects Mr. Colangelo’s personal account of the proceedings. According to publicly available Alberta court records, the criminal proceedings remain ACTIVE, including subsequent court appearances, an additional docket relating to an allegation of Failure to Comply with an Undertaking, and an arrest warrant that was recorded in June 2026 following a failure to appear. The court records also reflect continuing procedural activity after the dates referenced in Mr. Colangelo’s post.
There are no publicly available court document confirming Mr. Colangelo’s assertion that the remaining matter exists solely because of a clerical oversight. Likewise, there is no public court finding attributing the remaining criminal proceedings to the circumstances described in his LinkedIn post.
Mr. Joe Colangelo’s post also attributes harm to his family. No publicly available court finding, police record or independently verifiable evidence establishing evidence supporting Mr. Joe Colangelo's claims regarding harm to his family.
Readers are encouraged to rely on publicly available court records rather than social media posts when determining the procedural status of any criminal proceeding. As always, criminal charges, warrants, and procedural court actions are not findings of guilt, and all accused persons are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

Source: Joe Colangleo LinkedIn July 22 2026
The information published on this website is drawn from publicly accessible court records, corporate records, government sources, media reports and Joe Colangelo’s own public statements and social-media posts. Calgary Co-op and W. Brett Wilson have no involvement in the ownership, funding, operation, research, editorial direction or publication of this website.
No evidence has been presented supporting claims that either Calgary Co-op or Mr. Wilson are responsible for it. Any future allegation identifying another person or organization as being behind this website should likewise be supported by verifiable evidence before it is repeated as fact.
Readers should distinguish between allegations made in social media posts and facts that have been independently verified through public records, court documents, or other reliable sources. This website remains committed to correcting any factual information should credible, independently verifiable evidence become available.
Joe Colangelo LinkedIn Activity Timeline
These posts cover repeated claims and commentary posted by Joe Colangelo about Calgary Co-op’s governance, leadership, financial performance, board composition, AGM responses and alleged connection to online material about joe Colangelo. Not all posts by Joe Colangelo are indicated above.
The publicly indexed posts show a concentrated series directed at W. Brett Wilson from late June through July 2026. Several post allege or imply a connection to a website about Mr. Joe Colangelo, request meetings or explanations, and criticize Mr Brett Wilson’s lack of response. One post acknowledges that Mr. Brett Wilson denied involvement. Not all posts by Joe Colangelo are indicated above.
Official Calgary Co-op materials prepared for its 2026 Annual Member-Owner Meeting state that Calgary Co-op obtained a short-term restraining order against Joseph Colangelo in the fall of 2025.
According to the Calgary Co-op Board:
Calgary Co-op obtained a short-term restraining order against Mr. Colangelo in the fall of 2025. Although that order has since expired, the conduct that gave rise to it has continued.
The statement appeared in Calgary Co-op’s official document concerning Mr. Colangelo’s appeal of the termination of his membership. The Board listed what it characterized as continued disruptive conduct despite the restraining order as one of its reasons for recommending that members vote against his appeal.
Joe Colangelo Acknowledged the Restraining Order
Mr. Colangelo separately acknowledged the existence of the restraining order in a public LinkedIn post. He wrote that he had been under an order that restricted his public commentary about Calgary Co-op and stated that the order expired in October.
Mr. Joe Colangelo claimed that the order was imposed because he had a large following of Alberta businesspeople and dissatisfied Calgary Co-op members. That explanation represents Mr. Joe Colangelo’s own characterization of the circumstances. The actual court order has not been published with his post, so his explanation should not be treated as a statement by the court.
The statements from Calgary Co-op and Mr. Joe Colangelo therefore agree on two central points:
The complete terms of the order and the court’s reasons for granting it have not been provided in the publicly available materials.
The same Calgary Co-op document states that the Court of King’s Bench issued a costs order in Calgary Co-op’s favour.
The Board further alleged that Mr. Colangelo had not complied with the costs order despite the court’s direction and repeated follow-up from Calgary Co-op. This allegation was included as a reason supporting the Board’s decision to terminate his Calgary Co-op membership.
The amount of the costs order, payment deadline and complete terms are not disclosed in the AGM document. The statement should therefore be reported as Calgary Co-op’s position unless and until the signed costs order is obtained from the court file.
More recently, Mr. Colangelo published a LinkedIn post titled Calgary Co-op Pursues Emergency Restraining Order.
In that post, he stated that Calgary Co-op had initiated what he described as an emergency court application. He said that he intended to respond through the court process and criticized Calgary Co-op for pursuing legal action rather than meeting with him.
A related post attributed to Mr. Colangelo was titled Another Day, Another Restraining Order from Calgary Co-op and referred to legal correspondence, threats of litigation and his continuing request for a meeting.
Documented Timeline
Fall 2025: Calgary Co-op states that it obtained a short-term restraining order against Joseph Colangelo.
October 2025: According to Mr. Colangelo, the restraining order expired and was no longer binding.
March 2026: Calgary Co-op’s Board terminated Mr. Joe Colangelo’s membership, subject to his statutory and bylaw appeal rights. The Board later cited the restraining order, alleged continued conduct and alleged non-compliance with a costs order among its reasons for the termination.
2026 AGM materials: Calgary Co-op publicly disclosed the earlier restraining order and the Court of King’s Bench costs order in its statement opposing Mr. Joe Colangelo’s membership appeal.
More recent LinkedIn posts: Mr. Joe Colangelo stated that Calgary Co-op was pursuing another emergency restraining-order application and that he expected to respond through the court process. No publicly indexed ruling has yet been identified.
A court application is a request for relief. It is not proof that the requested order was granted or that the allegations contained in the application were proven.
The earlier 2025 restraining order is acknowledged in both Calgary Co-op’s official materials and Mr. Colangelo’s own public statement. The more recent emergency application is currently documented through Mr. Colangelo’s LinkedIn statements, but its filing details, evidence and outcome have not been independently confirmed through a copy of the court record.
This section is published for public-information and transparency purposes. It distinguishes between official Calgary Co-op statements, Mr. Colangelo’s public statements, allegations made by the parties and confirmed court outcomes. It does not make an independent finding of unlawful conduct.

Source: Joe Colangelo LinkedIn July 2026